Milenković, D. ., Cvetković, V. M., & Renner, R. (2024). A Systematic Literary Review on Community Resilience Indicators: Adaptation and Application of the BRIC Method for Measuring Disasters Resilience. c, 6(2), 79–104. Review Article A Systematic Literary Review on Community Resilience Indicators: Adaptation and Application of the BRIC Method for Measuring Disasters Resilience Dalibor Milenković1,3, Vladimir M. Cvetković 1,2,3,4*, Renate Renner 4,1 1 Scientific-Professional Society for Disaster Risk Management, Dimitrija Tucovića 121, 11040 Belgrade, Serbia; milenkovic.dalibor82@gmail.com; 2 Department of Disaster Management and Environmental Security, Faculty of Security Studies, University of Belgrade, Gospodara Vučića 50, 11040 Belgrade, Serbia; 3 International Institute for Disaster Research, Dimitrija Tucovića 121, 11040 Belgrade, Serbia; 4 Safety and Disaster Studies, Department of Environmental and Energy Process Engineering, Montanuniversität of Leoben, Franz Josef-Straße 18, 8700 Leoben, Austria; renate.renner@unileoben.ac.at * Correspondence: vladimir.cvetkovic@unileoben.ac.at Received: 17 August 2024; Revised: 9 November 2024; Accepted 5 December; Published: 25 December   Abstract     Keywords   Community resilience represents an important concept in the comprehensive approach to dis- aster management. It is assumed that optimal community resilience can mitigate negative impacts and enable adaptation, thereby reducing the negative consequences of future disasters. The meas- urement of community resilience to disasters has advanced over the past two decades, primarily through the use of indicators that measure community resilience indices. The Baseline Resilience Indicators for Communities (BRIC) represent an increasingly popular and frequently used quanti- tative method for measuring community resilience indices to disasters. This literature review was conducted to examine and assess the use and adaptation of the BRIC method in measuring commu- nity resilience. The review comprehensively analyzes relevant scientific papers, extracting and syn- thesizing the most important findings from the studies, which provided the necessary data to meet the objectives of the literature review. A total of 37 relevant studies were identified for analysis in the review. The indicators used were examined, […]